Relationships Between EHR-Based Audit Log Data and Physician Burnout and Clinical Practice Process Measures.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship of electronic health record (EHR)-based audit log data with physician burnout and clinical practice process measures. METHODS: From September 4 to October 7, 2019, we surveyed physicians in a larger academic medical department and matched responses to August 1 through October 31, 2019, EHR-based audit log data. Multivariable regression analysis evaluated the relationship between log data and burnout and the interrelationship between log data and turnaround time for In Basket messages and percentage of encounters closed within 24 hours. RESULTS: Of the 537 physicians surveyed, 413 (77%) responded. On multivariable analysis, number of In Basket messages received per day (each additional message: odds ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.07]; P<.001) and time spent in the EHR outside scheduled patient care (each additional hour: odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.02]; P=.04) were associated with burnout. Time spent doing In Basket work (each additional minute: parameter estimate, -0.11 [95% CI, -0.19 to -0.03]; P=.01) and in the EHR outside scheduled patient care (each additional hour: parameter estimate, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]; P=.002) were associated with turnaround time (days per message) for In Basket messages. None of the variables explored were independently associated with percentage of encounters closed within 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Electronic health record-based audit log data of workload relate to odds of burnout and responsiveness to patient-related inquiries and results. Further study is needed to determine whether interventions that reduce the number of and time spent doing In Basket messages or time spent in the EHR outside scheduled patient care reduce physician burnout and improve clinical practice process measures.

Outcomes of Mayo Clinic reBoot camps for postimplementation training in the electronic health record.

OBJECTIVE: After a new electronic health record (EHR) was implemented at Mayo Clinic, a training program called reBoot Camp was created to enhance ongoing education in response to needs identified by physician leaders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A reBoot camp focused on EHR topics pertinent to ambulatory care was offered from April 2018 through June 2020. There were 37 2-day sessions and 43 1-day sessions, with 673 unique participants. To evaluate outcomes of the reBoot camp, we used survey data to study baseline, immediate, and long-term perceptions of program satisfaction and self-assessed skills with the EHR. The study was conducted among practitioners at a large ambulatory practice network based in several states. Data were collected from April 2018 through January 2021. We analyzed automatically collected metadata and scores that evaluated the amount of personalization and proficiency of use. RESULTS: Confidence in skills increased by 13.5 points for general EHR use and was significant in 5 subdomains of use (13-18 point improvement). This degree of user confidence was maintained at the 6-month reassessment. The outcomes of configuration and proficiency scores also improved significantly. DISCUSSION: Ongoing education regarding EHR tools is necessary to support continued use of technology. This study was novel because of the amount and breadth of data collected, diversity of user participation, and validation that improvements were maintained over time. CONCLUSIONS: Participating in a reBoot camp significantly improved user confidence in each domain of the EHR and demonstrated use of best-practice tools. Users maintained gains at the 6-month evaluation phase.

The high-value pharmacy enterprise framework: Advancing pharmacy practice in health systems through a consensus-based, strategic approach.

PURPOSE: The high-value pharmacy enterprise (HVPE) framework and constituent best practice consensus statements are presented, and the methods used to develop the framework's 8 domains are described. SUMMARY: A panel of pharmacy leaders used an evidence- and expert opinion-based approach to define core and aspirational elements of practice that should be established within contemporary health-system pharmacy enterprises by calendar year 2025. Eight domains of an HVPE were identified: Patient Care Services; Business Services; Ambulatory and Specialty Pharmacy Services; Inpatient Operations; Safety and Quality; Pharmacy Workforce; Information Technology, Data, and Information Management; and Leadership. Phase 1 of the project consisted of the development of draft practice statements, performance elements, and supporting evidence for each domain by panelists, followed by a phase 2 in-person meeting for review and development of consensus for statements and performance elements in each domain. During phase 3, the project cochairs and panelists finalized the domain drafts and incorporated them into a full technical report and this summary report. CONCLUSION: The HVPE framework is a strategic roadmap to advance pharmacy practice by ensuring safe, effective, and patient-centered medication management and business practices throughout the health-system pharmacy enterprise. Grounded in evidence and expert recommendations, the statements and associated performance elements can be used to identify strategic priorities to improve patient outcomes and add value within health systems.